One of my favourite books I own is a third addition of the Architects
Guide published in 1894, this is a fascinating, and eye opening, insight into
the workings of the construction industry during the 19th Century.
It would appear that the second addition was published in July 1884.
Contents pages.
All this inequality, for the ultimate good of the profession, ought to be changed; for, however honourable a man may be, his direct worldly interest should be that the cost of a building should be as much, not as little, as possible.”
Another wonderful chapter of the book is on guidance on Building Contracts. The basic principles described are very similar to a traditional JCT contract, although I do not recall the last time I wrote:
“Agreement made this 21st day of June in the year of our Lord 1884......”
First page of the book
The index is interesting, it shows the huge range of skills
that the 19th Century Architect would need to be competent in, this
ranges from advice on specifications through to types of building stones, both
sandstone and lime stones in Great Britain and their qualities on using them.
Subjects also covered among others is Brickwork, Hydraulic lime, Timber and
Carpentry, iron construction, below ground drains and canals.
Contents pages.
In the first chapter the writer talks about many aspects of
the profession, it also talks about the social shortcomings of standard wages
for those craftsmen who are gifted and those who are less so. He then moves on
to the subject of fees and talks extensively about the short comings of a fixed
percentage:
“Thus a payment of five percent. Upon the
cost of a long line of plain prison walling, appears a monstrously liberal
amount, earnable by the lowest of talent; while the same rate of percentage
upon an elaborately decorated church, with all its minute fittings, screen
work, and furnishings, would hardly give the architect the living of a hedge
carpenter. All this inequality, for the ultimate good of the profession, ought to be changed; for, however honourable a man may be, his direct worldly interest should be that the cost of a building should be as much, not as little, as possible.”
Another wonderful chapter of the book is on guidance on Building Contracts. The basic principles described are very similar to a traditional JCT contract, although I do not recall the last time I wrote:
“Agreement made this 21st day of June in the year of our Lord 1884......”
The contract stipulates completion dates as one would
expect, however it does still talk about Liquidated Damages if the work
continues beyond the stated completion date. It also talks about the control of
workmanship, labour and quality of materials on site.
One of the most interesting items in the contract is the
section on payments where the wording requires the client to pay the contract
sum to contractor:
“...by instalments at the rate of 75 per
cent. Of the value of the work done and fixed in its place, and .........per
cent. Of the value of work and materials brought upon the site...”
To my simple mind, this would suggest that the retention on
interim invoices under the contract of the day was 25%! So while the architect
writing this book feels undervalued, the contractors of the day too had a
pretty hard time, 25% retention seems unimaginable in this day and age of 5%
and 2.5% penultimate and rectification period. Rather strangely there is no
mention of the rectification period or how the poor contractor can get his 25%
back at the end of the rectification period in the book, if there was no
framework for it in the contract the scope for disputes for those large sums
would be huge.
Towards the end of the book the methods of measuring for
quantities are discussed at length, and the best methods for particular types
of trade. A wonderful, and very timely section, looks at the Methods of
Measurement for the Building of the Houses of Parliament.
The first of several pages on the Methods of Measurement for the Building of the Houses of Parliament.
I hope the above has been interesting.
Thanks for reading
James
Comments
Post a Comment